广州辅导GMAT考试哪家机构效果好名单榜首一览

广州辅导GMAT考试哪家机构效果好名单榜首一览，GMAT考试，中文名称为经企管理类研究生入学考试。GMAT考试成绩是美国、英国、澳大利亚等商学院录取和奖学金发放的一项重要指标，但是国内针对GMAT培训的机构并不多，优质的机构就更少。这里小编推荐新东方英语，新东方为留学生提供了全面的课程体系，在语言培训、学术课程、文化交流等方面都有着完善的教学计划。学生可以根据自己的需要进行选择和调整，打造较适合自己的学习计划。

新东方的GMAT课程拥有较为全面的备考方案，老师团队卓有成效，教材完善且具有很高的实用性，技巧和策略使备考过程更有成效，许多考生都取得了不错的成绩。新东方的GMAT课程不仅能够帮助考生备考GMAT考试，还能让考生收获在学习上的乐趣，取得更好的考试成绩。

新东方GMAT课程优势

1.讲-练-测一体化学习模式，学完即可参加考试;

2.教师团队严谨教学，指导老师全天监督学员完成学习任务;

3.高强度、短时间、效果好;

4.学习效果阶段评估，及时反馈家长，了解学生学习进度。

GMAT作文考试错误的七宗罪

第 一宗罪：无因果联系

The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

第二宗罪 样本不足

The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

第三宗罪: 错误类比

The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

第四宗罪 时地全等

The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

第五宗罪 二者择一

The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

第六宗罪 可疑调查

The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

第七宗罪 结论无据

The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility