2019年场考试再次出现部分考场系统崩溃的情况，导致了很多同学耗费大量时间，甚至得重新安排考试。托福考试不是拼实力的吗？现在还得拼运气了？！不管怎么样，系统可以崩，心态不能炸，考试还得继续……下面来看看2019年1月5日托福考试的口语、写作详情分析吧。

2019年场考试再次出现部分考场系统崩溃的情况，导致了很多同学耗费大量时间，甚至得重新安排考试。托福考试不是拼实力的吗？现在还得拼运气了？！

不管怎么样，系统可以崩，心态不能炸，考试还得继续……下面来看看2019年1月5日托福考试的口语、写作详情分析吧。

2019年1月5日 托福考试-口语部分

Task 1

(与2018.10.27 task1 重复)

如果学校要开课培养人才（之类的）哪种好？

1. better public speaker

2. improve the photography skill

3. business

参考范文：

Personally, I prefer to learn to be a better public speaker.

It’s not only practical for collage students but also beneficial for all students in later jobs or business. To be specific, as collage students, we usually have class presentation, which requires us to speak in front of the whole class. If we have been trained to be  good public speakers, things would be much easier when it comes to presentation. As a good result, we could have a better performance in a lot courses.

Besides, after graduation, some of us will have to interview for job positions. Expressing ourselves clearly and with confidence could leave a good impressionon interviewers. In this case ,we have better chances to get ideal job offers.

Task 2

（与2017.1.7 task2重复）

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Friends should be able to disagree with each other and still maintain their friendship.

Use details and examples to explain your opinion.

参考范文：

I agree with the statement that friends should be able to disagree with each other and still maintain their friendship.

First, people are born differently, and friends are raised in different family backgrounds. That means there must be disagreements between any two or more people. Like, I think it’s not a necessity to go back homeon every traditional holiday. While my best friend Emma goes back home on holiday even if there is important exam at school, which I couldn’t understand but it doesn’t influence our friendship.

Moreover, sometimes I think it’s better for friends to have different thoughts about things. In this case, friends could exchange ideas and perspectives to broaden horizon and avoid being narrow minded.

2019年1月5日 托福考试-写作部分

综合写作

重复2015年12月12日

阅读：有一种海洋吸尘器（oceancleanup array）可以收集并清除海洋里的塑料碎片。

1：成本不高。因为海洋吸尘器是通过洋流将碎片运到设备中，不像其他清洁设备需要很多能源；

2：不会对其他海洋生物产生不利影响。海洋吸尘器是固定在一个地方的，不会像其他清洁设备用网，就不会伤害到海洋生物；

3：塑料碎片可循环利用。海洋吸尘器收集到的大部分塑料物质可以卖给废品回收站循环再利用。

听力：海洋吸尘器也有一些问题。

1：放置在海洋里的设备因为海水具有腐蚀性而特别容易被破坏，海洋吸尘器需要频繁的修理，修理的费用较高；而且需要几百个devices才能清理掉碎片，并不省钱；

2：虽然游动的海洋生物不会有影响，但是浮游生物plankton会受到较大影响，以plankton为食的生物也会受到影响；

3：海洋吸尘器收集到的是聚乙烯、聚丙烯等物质的碎片混合在一起的。如想要循环利用的话，需要将它们分离，而分离需要花钱。

话题分类：科技与生物类

解题思路：解释清楚听力如何反驳阅读即可。

参考范文：

The lecture raises several arguments to counter the reading’s point that an ocean cleanup array can effectively deal with ocean plastic debris.

First, the reading points out the ocean cleanup array is rather cheap because ocean current is used to transport debris to the device. On the contrary, the lecture holds the opposite opinion that such a device is easily broken because of corrosive sea water, requiring frequent repair at a price. In addition, for the removal of the debris,hundreds of devices are needed. The two features mean that this device does not save money.

Second, while the reading believes that the ocean cleanup array does not exert an adverse effect on other marine creatures,the lecture disagrees with it by telling that plankton in the sea surface will be hurt though there is little impact on swimming marine life. According to the lecture, it will have a repercussion on the biologic chain, and creatures feeding on plankton will also be negatively influenced.

Third, despite the fact from the reading that plastic debris collected by the ocean cleanup array can be recycled, the lecture contends that what the ocean cleanup array collects is debris with polyethylene and polypropylene combined. In thiscase, if with an aim of reusing, they should be separated, which also requires money.

独立写作

Do you agree or disagree with thestatement:

Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep themas secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.

话题分类：科学类

解题思路：利弊类题目，采取五段式写法即可

参考范文：

From my perspective, sharing scientific findings worldwide is not feasible and the government ought to keep them secret.

Granted, if with scientific discoveries shared extensively, it might be a blessing for the advances of science,  because plenty of scientific achievements come from continuous in-depth research and cooperation among countries. If scientific findings could be open to scientists worldwide, it might serve as acatalyst for a chain of new discoveries, for researchers can effectively diginto their fields based on the previous of other professionals’ research results.

Nevertheless, the above potential benefit fails to justify that sharing scientific discoveries globally is actually advisable, which, instead, will bring repercussions. For one thing, it will have an adverse effect on countries’ security. Conceivably, scientific tasks, such as research on atomic bombs, are often related with the goal of preserving the nation’s peace. If the government does not keep the relevant scientific findings as secrets, no one can guarantee that these discoveries will not be misused by immoral people or nations, which will be further detrimental to the security of some countries or even the whole world. In other words, keeping research findings secret plays a key role inmaintaining the global peace.

For another, publicly sharing scientific results is not fair to relevant researchers. Apparently, researching into scientific fields, like renewable energy resources, requires painstaking efforts.With perhaps dozens of years devoted to research, scientists may be eager for rewards, such as a patent or a Nobel Prize in physics. However, if with their precious research findings available to other scientists, it might lead to acommonly confusing question: who has discovered it? A possible reason for it is that with scientific findings shared all over the world, research will be undertaken on the basis of combining many professionals’ research fruits. In this case, it is extremely difficult to define who has mainly contributed to the most updated scientific discovery, so, for example, no matter who has been awarded a Nobel Prize in physics, relevant scientists who have taken part in the research will all feel unfair.

Conclusively, demerits of making scientific research discoveries available to the whole world outweigh its potential merit, and governments had better keep them secret.